43 research outputs found
A three domain covariance framework for EEG/MEG data
In this paper we introduce a covariance framework for the analysis of EEG and
MEG data that takes into account observed temporal stationarity on small time
scales and trial-to-trial variations. We formulate a model for the covariance
matrix, which is a Kronecker product of three components that correspond to
space, time and epochs/trials, and consider maximum likelihood estimation of
the unknown parameter values. An iterative algorithm that finds approximations
of the maximum likelihood estimates is proposed. We perform a simulation study
to assess the performance of the estimator and investigate the influence of
different assumptions about the covariance factors on the estimated covariance
matrix and on its components. Apart from that, we illustrate our method on real
EEG and MEG data sets.
The proposed covariance model is applicable in a variety of cases where
spontaneous EEG or MEG acts as source of noise and realistic noise covariance
estimates are needed for accurate dipole localization, such as in evoked
activity studies, or where the properties of spontaneous EEG or MEG are
themselves the topic of interest, such as in combined EEG/fMRI experiments in
which the correlation between EEG and fMRI signals is investigated.Comment: 25 pages, 8 figures, 1 tabl
Regional analysis of volumes and reproducibilities of automatic and manual hippocampal segmentations
PURPOSE: Precise and reproducible hippocampus outlining is important to quantify hippocampal atrophy caused by neurodegenerative diseases and to spare the hippocampus in whole brain radiation therapy when performing prophylactic cranial irradiation or treating brain metastases. This study aimed to quantify systematic differences between methods by comparing regional volume and outline reproducibility of manual, FSL-FIRST and FreeSurfer hippocampus segmentations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a dataset from ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative), including 20 healthy controls, 40 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 20 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). For each subject back-to-back (BTB) T1-weighted 3D MPRAGE images were acquired at time-point baseline (BL) and 12 months later (M12). Hippocampi segmentations of all methods were converted into triangulated meshes, regional volumes were extracted and regional Jaccard indices were computed between the hippocampi meshes of paired BTB scans to evaluate reproducibility. Regional volumes and Jaccard indices were modelled as a function of group (G), method (M), hemisphere (H), time-point (T), region (R) and interactions. RESULTS: For the volume data the model selection procedure yielded the following significant main effects G, M, H, T and R and interaction effects G-R and M-R. The same model was found for the BTB scans. For all methods volumes reduces with the severity of disease. Significant fixed effects for the regional Jaccard index data were M, R and the interaction M-R. For all methods the middle region was most reproducible, independent of diagnostic group. FSL-FIRST was most and FreeSurfer least reproducible. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: A novel method to perform detailed analysis of subtle differences in hippocampus segmentation is proposed. The method showed that hippocampal segmentation reproducibility was best for FSL-FIRST and worst for Freesurfer. We also found systematic regional differences in hippocampal segmentation between different methods reinforcing the need of adopting harmonized protocols
Predicted Jaccard indices for the whole hippocampus for the different segmentation methods.
<p>Predicted Jaccard indices for the whole hippocampus for the different segmentation methods.</p
Predicted volumes (cm<sup>3</sup>) for the left hippocampus at time-point BL for all segmentation methods.
<p>Predicted volumes (cm<sup>3</sup>) for the left hippocampus at time-point BL for all segmentation methods.</p
Procedure to make a regional analysis.
<p>Top and bottom rows show the conversion from a hippocampus segmentation and the six regional mask to a triangulated mesh respectively. The right part of the figure illustrates the registration procedure to map the six regional hippocampus mask to the left and right hippocampus mesh.</p
Frequency distribution of the azimuthal and polar angles of the orientation of axonal and dendritic segments among 100 NETMORPH-generated neurons.
<p>A superimposed sine curve shows the slight skewness of the polar angle distribution.</p